Source : Alan Collet www.gomatilda.com
Since Australia’s Immigration Minister announced changes to the skilled migration program at the end of last year there has been a lot of misunderstanding among intending skilled migrants. In this article we try to dispel some of the myths.
In no particular order, here are some of the comments we have heard in recent months:
Australia has stopped accepting skilled migrants
Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, Australia’s skilled migration program (the amount of visas the Immigration Minister requires his Department to grant annually) is the highest on record this year, with a planned 115,000 skilled visas to be granted in the year to 30th of June, 2009.
The skilled program for 2009/10 is planned to be 108,100, which is the third highest program on record.
By way of comparison the skilled program in the last few years has delivered the following outcomes:
2007/08: 108,540
– 2006/07: 97,920
– 2005/06: 97,340
– 2004/05: 77,880
My occupation is not on the Critical Skills List and I can’t be sponsored by a State or Territory Government. That means I will never get a visa.
It is true to say that the Minister’s announcements have impacted quite significantly on the processing of skilled visas, with occupations on the CSL and State/Territory Sponsored skilled visa applications being the only offshore skilled visa applications that are being processed to a decision at the moment.
However, there will come a time (we anticipate in the next 3 to 4 months) when Department of Immigration case officers will have to move onto the next category on the Minister’s priority list, namely applications where an occupation on the Migration Occupations in Demand List (or MODL) is nominated.
We anticipate that many applicants with MODL occupations will have sought sponsorship from a State or Territory Government (as MODL occupations have tended to be included on their Wanted Skills Lists) and as such we think it likely that remaining skilled visa applications will start to be looked at with a view to visas being granted during the.
It should also be remembered that when the total skilled migration program was in the region of 70,000 annually processing times were typically 9 to 12 months – even allowing for heightened demand in recent years the large program total that is now available should allow visa application processing times to be closer to 12 months over the next year to 18 months.
And as ever, the sooner a visa application is lodged the sooner a visa will be granted.
I won’t be able to obtain sponsorship from a State or Territory Government
To a verying degree all of the States and Territories in Australia are sponsoring skilled individuals for the grant of visas. Some are sponsoring for the grant of provisional subclass 475 visas (which provide for permanent residency via a second visa application once subclass 475 visaholders have been residing and working in a regional area for the required period), while others are sponsoring for subclass 176 permanent residency visas.
The key question for intending skilled migrants is therefore which States and Territories are sponsoring my occupation, and for what subclass of visa.
If I am sponsored by a State or Territory Government I will have to live there while I remain in Australia
Technically, that is not the case. If applying to a State or Territory Government for sponsorship you will be asked to provide information that demonstrates you are genuine in your intentions to reside in that State or Territory.
Indeed, in most cases you will be asked to sign an undertaking to reside in the sponsoring State/Territory for at least 2 years.
We would add that when applying for sponsorship you should be completing the application in good faith, with a genuine intention to reside in the State or Territory to which you are applying.
Note also that if applying for sponsorship of a subclass 475 (provisional) visa you will be subject to a visa condition that requires you to live and work in a regional area of Australia, and that you can anticipate that this will be checked when you apply for permanent residency in due course.
Employers are no longer able to sponsor individuals for skilled visas
This comment is typically heard in the context of subclass 457 visas – which is the long term temporary residency visa.
It is fair to say that Australia’s Immigration Minister has sought to change 457 visa sentiment amongst employers by issuing “clarification” in the last few months in the form of policy guidance to his Department. This has included (amongst other things) requiring employers to more clearly demonstrate the benefit to Australia arising as a consequence of the employment of the nominated individual following the grant of a 457 visa.
However, this amendment of policy settings has not caused a cessation of 457 visa grants – far from it. Indeed, Go Matilda has had many 457 visas granted in the last few months.
Even if I obtain a visa, the global economic crisis means I won’t be able to get a job when I move to Australia
The Australian economy has held up remarkably well in comparison with other first world countries, and indeed has thus far avoided a technical recession. This is quite possibly due to its closer associations economically with South East Asia and China, and the financial boost associated with a growth in population, most notably through the large migration programs of the last few years.
By contrast the UK has found itself more closely aligned with the fortunes of the US, and with the collapse of wealth through banking and housing failures.
No-one can say that any one individual will be certain to secure employment when they move to Australia. However, the prospects for work are generally considered to be brighter in Australia than in the UK, US, etc, which should augur well for intending migrants.
I won’t be able to sell my house and the GBP – AUD exchange rate is awful
Yes, the economies of the world are in a dreadful state at the moment, and the bottom has fallen out of the housing market in the UK.
However, there is no requirement for you to move to Australia as soon as your visa is granted – permanent skilled visas require you to enter Australia by an initial entry date, which is usually 12 months from the earlier of the date of police clearance certificates and the date medical examinations were attended.
That required initial entry can be on a holiday, and the permanent move can be a few years later – at any time up to 5 years after visa grant – by which time we suggest the economies of the world and the currency exchange rate will be somewhat different, most probably better than they are today.
This means that applying for a skilled visa now rather than waiting could actually mean that you find yourself migrating at a better time than those who have been granted their visas in the last 12 months.
If you are a skilled individual and are contemplating a move to Australia some of the above issues might have crossed your mind.
If you would like to talk about your concerns and to discuss the migration process more fully please contact us.
Go Matilda has many years of experience assisting with Australian visa applications, and we will be pleased to have a free initial discussion about your situation, your visa strategy, and how we might help, after which we can send you a no obligation proposal as to our fees.
Read Full Post »
Ramsay fires back at Grimshaw
Posted in Local News, tagged "sexist, A Current Affair, abusing, aimed, allegations, allegedly, angry reaction, appearance, arrogant, at the food show, attack, audience, Australia, avalanche, bitter, blown out of proportion, branding, Britain, bully, calling, celebrity chef, chefs, comments, compared, confine, congratulating, deeply mortified, denied, disgusting, extra-marital affair, Fairfax Radio Network, fired, fray, gay., generated, global, Good Food and Wine Show, Gordon, Gordon Ramsay., Grimshaw, guilty, Health Minister, himself, homophobic remarks"., insinuations, intended, joke, Julia Gillard, kevin rudd, kitchen, lawyers, lesbian, Local News, long-running, Melbourne's, Melbourne's Yarra River, members, Mr Rudd's deputy, Ms Gillard, narcissist, New Zealand, Nicola Roxon, nine network, offensive, outburst, overwhelmed, photo, pig, Prime Minister, private life, program, prop., public, public rant, Ramsay, rant, ratings, reflected, remorse, report, reporters, sad, scrutinised, second, sex god, sexuality, stop, support, Tana, The Mail Online, The Mirror, tongue-in-cheek, too far, Tracy Grimshaw, TV chef, TV presenter, uninformed, US, US celebrity watcher Perez Hilton, veteran, viewers, volley, weekend, wife, women, women's groups. on June 9, 2009| 1 Comment »
Days after a public rant aimed at Tracy Grimshaw, celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay has fired a second volley branding the TV presenter “sad”
and “bitter” for defending herself.
Ramsay denied calling the Nine Network veteran a lesbian at a weekend appearance at Melbourne’s Good Food and Wine Show during which he also allegedly compared her to a pig, using an offensive photo as a prop.
Ramsay on Tuesday said he was “deeply mortified” that his intended joke had been blown out of proportion – and that was before Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said the chef’s comments reflected a “new form of low life”.
Mr Rudd’s deputy Julia Gillard and Health Minister Nicola Roxon joined the fray, saying Ramsay should confine himself to the kitchen and stop abusing women.
But there was no remorse from the TV chef after Grimshaw used her A Current Affair program on Monday to take him to task over his food show rant.
Ramsay on Tuesday said he’d never used the word “lesbian” to describe Grimshaw, and said she herself was guilty of a “disgusting” attack on his wife Tana, who’s due in Australia in two weeks.
“She’s obviously doing it for the ratings,” he said of Grimshaw, speaking to reporters after a run along Melbourne’s Yarra River.
On Monday, Grimshaw branded Ramsay a bully and an “arrogant narcissist”. She said he’d made “uninformed insinuations” at the food show about her sexuality, and she told her viewers she was not gay.
Grimshaw said that before a recent interview for her program, Ramsay had insisted she refrain from asking about his private life following allegations of a long-running extra-marital affair.
“We all know why,” she said.
She added: “… I’m not surprised by any of this. We’ve all seen how Gordon Ramsay treats his wife – and he supposedly loves her. We’re all just fodder to him.”
Asked if he could understand how Grimshaw felt, Ramsay told reporters: “I never once said the word lesbian, I was having a tongue-in-cheek joke – it was not at her expense.
“For me on a personal front, to see how sad and how bitter for someone to come out like that, for a renowned pro to come out and stoop that low, is disgusting.”
He said tapes of the alleged incident were being scrutinised by his lawyers.
Mr Rudd was firmly in Grimshaw’s corner on Tuesday, congratulating her for giving Ramsay a “left uppercut” in her reply.
“I think I can describe his remarks as reflecting a new form of low life,” he told the Fairfax Radio Network.
“I just drew breath when I saw the sort of stuff which was said about her. I just think that’s off and offensive.”
Earlier, Ms Gillard said the celebrity chef should stay in the kitchen.
“I think perhaps what he should do is confine himself to the kitchen and make nice things for people to eat rather than make public comments about others,” she said.
Health Minister Nicola Roxon said there was no need for “women to be abused in our community at any level”.
Grimshaw said she had been overwhelmed by the avalanche of support she’d received.
The fallout from Ramsay’s rant has gone global, spreading to his homeland Britain and to the US and New Zealand.
Britain’s The Mirror sent up Ramsay in a report headlined: “Good thing Gordon Ramsay is such a sex god.”
“Gordon is such a handsome devil, a veritable sex god come to Earth to live among men, you can understand why he might feel that mere mortals are unworthy of his presence,” the report said.
The Mail Online carried a report about the outburst and the angry reaction it had generated among audience members and women’s groups.
US celebrity watcher Perez Hilton said Ramsay had gone too far with his “sexist, homophobic remarks”.
Source www.ninemsn.com.au
Read Full Post »